Sample Reports
Click any standard to see a fully structured sample report with realistic geological data, classification tables, drill results, resource estimates, and Competent Person statements. Every report is auto-generated by CoreElement.AI.
Mineral Resource Estimate - JORC Code 2012 Edition
VEGA-GOLD-1 Deposit · Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia
1. Mineral Resource Statement
Mineral Resource estimate reported at a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade for open pit and 2.0 g/t Au for underground. Resource classification per JORC Code 2012 guidelines on geological confidence, drill spacing, and data quality.
| CLASSIFICATION | TONNAGE (Mt) | GRADE Au (g/t) | CONTAINED Au (koz) | CONFIDENCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ● Measured | 2.84 | 4.72 | 431 | High - drill spacing ≤25×25m |
| ● Indicated | 5.21 | 3.48 | 583 | Moderate - 25×25m to 50×50m |
| ● Inferred | 3.67 | 2.91 | 343 | Low - spacing >50×50m |
| TOTAL M+I+Inf | 11.72 | 3.60 | 1,357 | - |
2. Table 1 - Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
| CRITERIA | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|
| Sampling techniques | Diamond core (HQ/NQ) and Reverse Circulation (RC, 140mm) drilling. Core split with diamond saw, half-core sampled at 1m intervals through mineralised zones. RC samples collected via cyclone, riffle-split to ~3kg. |
| Drilling techniques | 47 diamond drill holes (DDH) totalling 14,280m. 23 RC holes totalling 3,680m. Core oriented using Reflex ACT III tool. Average hole depth 210m (DDH), 160m (RC). |
| Drill sample recovery | DDH core recovery averaged 97.3% (range 89-100%). RC sample recovery monitored by weighing. No significant sample loss identified in mineralised zones. |
| Logging | All DDH core geologically and geotechnically logged. Lithology, mineralogy, alteration, veining, structure recorded at 0.5m intervals. Core photography (wet/dry) for full length. RC chips logged per metre. |
| Sub-sampling techniques | Core sawn longitudinally, consistent half-core side sampled. Samples crushed to -2mm (70%), pulverised to -75μm (85%). 1:20 field duplicates, 1:25 CRM insertions, 1:30 blank insertions. |
| Quality of assay data | Primary laboratory: ALS Perth (ISO 17025). Au by 50g fire assay with AAS finish (Au-AA26). Multi-element by 4-acid ICP-MS (ME-MS61). Umpire lab: SGS Kalgoorlie (5% of samples). CRM pass rate 96.2%. Blank failures: 0/84. |
| Verification of sampling | Independent verification by CoreElement.AI QA/QC engine: Shewhart control charts for CRMs (±2σ), duplicate HARD analysis (mean HARD 8.3%, within 15% tolerance), zero blank contamination events. |
| Location of data points | Collar positions surveyed by differential GPS (±0.02m). Downhole survey: Reflex EZ-TRAC at 30m intervals. Grid: MGA Zone 51 (GDA2020). RL to AHD. Topography from LiDAR DTM (0.25m resolution). |
| Data spacing and distribution | Measured: 25×25m (infill area, 200m×400m). Indicated: 50×50m (extensions). Inferred: >50m (peripheral). Mineralised zone continuity confirmed over 1,200m strike, 50-180m down-dip. |
| Audits or reviews | Internal review by designated CP. No external audit to date. Full data and QA/QC package available for independent review. CoreElement.AI platform maintains complete audit trail with data lineage. |
3. Table 1 - Section 3: Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
| CRITERIA | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|
| Database integrity | All data imported into CoreElement.AI Data Lake with automated validation: collar/survey check (max 5° deviation), overlapping interval detection, negative depth flagging. 14 records corrected from original database (0.03% error rate). |
| Geological interpretation | Mineralisation hosted in sheared mafic volcanics (basalt-dolerite) at contact with banded iron formation (BIF). Three ore lenses interpreted: Main Lode (strike 340°, dip 65°W), Footwall Lode, Hanging Wall Lode. Interpreted with 50m confidence. |
| Dimensions | Main Lode: 1,200m strike × 180m down-dip × 3-15m true width. Footwall: 600m × 120m × 2-8m. Hanging Wall: 400m × 80m × 1-5m. Total mineralised envelope ~2.1km along strike. |
| Estimation methodology | Ordinary Kriging (OK) in 10×10×5m parent blocks, sub-blocked to 2.5×2.5×2.5m at domain boundaries. Grade interpolated within wireframed domains. Hard boundaries applied between lodes. Validated by IDW and NN check estimates (±7% global match). |
| Variography | Experimental variograms modelled in 3 directions (along strike, down-dip, across-strike). Nugget: 35% of total sill. Major range: 85m (along strike). Semi-major: 55m (down-dip). Minor: 12m (across-strike). Spherical model. |
| Cut-off grade | Open pit: 0.5 g/t Au (based on A$15/t mining, A$18/t processing, 93% recovery, Au price A$4,200/oz). Underground: 2.0 g/t Au (based on A$80/t mining, A$25/t processing, 90% recovery). |
| Bulk density | 344 immersion measurements on core. Fresh rock: 2.82 t/m³ (range 2.71-2.95). Oxide: 2.15 t/m³. Transitional: 2.48 t/m³. Density assigned per weathering domain. No voids encountered. |
| Classification | Measured: minimum 4 DDH composites, max 25m from estimate point, kriging variance <30%. Indicated: min 2 DDH composites, max 60m, slope of regression >0.5. Inferred: remainder within wireframe, informed by at least 1 drill intercept. |
4. Sensitivity Analysis - Resource vs Cut-off Grade
| CUT-OFF (g/t Au) | TONNES (Mt) | GRADE (g/t Au) | CONTAINED Au (koz) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 | 14.81 | 2.98 | 1,419 |
| 0.5 (OP base case) | 11.72 | 3.60 | 1,357 |
| 1.0 | 8.43 | 4.51 | 1,222 |
| 2.0 (UG base case) | 5.18 | 5.87 | 978 |
| 3.0 | 3.42 | 7.14 | 785 |
| 5.0 | 1.53 | 9.82 | 483 |
5. Drillhole Summary
| HOLE ID | EASTING | NORTHING | RL | DEPTH (m) | TYPE | AZ/DIP | BEST INTERCEPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VG-DDH-001 | 362,418 | 6,584,220 | 348 | 285 | DDH HQ | 270°/-60° | 12m @ 8.42 g/t Au from 142m |
| VG-DDH-002 | 362,443 | 6,584,195 | 346 | 310 | DDH NQ | 270°/-65° | 18m @ 5.73 g/t Au from 198m |
| VG-DDH-003 | 362,468 | 6,584,170 | 351 | 245 | DDH HQ | 270°/-55° | 7m @ 12.1 g/t Au from 167m |
| VG-RC-004 | 362,493 | 6,584,245 | 344 | 180 | RC 140mm | 270°/-60° | 4m @ 3.81 g/t Au from 88m |
| VG-DDH-005 | 362,518 | 6,584,145 | 349 | 320 | DDH HQ | 270°/-70° | 22m @ 6.18 g/t Au from 224m incl. 5m @ 14.3 g/t |
| ... 65 additional holes not shown (full data available in platform) ... | |||||||
6. QA/QC Summary
| QA/QC PARAMETER | PROTOCOL | RESULT | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Standards | 1:25 insertion (OREAS 262, 260, 258) | Pass rate 96.2% (±2σ) | ✓ PASS |
| Blanks | 1:30 insertion (certified blank) | 0/84 failures (0.0%) | ✓ PASS |
| Field Duplicates | 1:20 (quarter-core) | Mean HARD 8.3% | ✓ PASS (<15%) |
| Coarse Duplicates | 1:40 (crush-split) | Mean HARD 5.1% | ✓ PASS (<10%) |
| Umpire Lab | 5% to SGS Kalgoorlie | Mean bias +2.8%, R²=0.987 | ✓ PASS (<5%) |
| Data Validation | CoreElement.AI auto-checks | 14/48,220 records corrected (0.03%) | ✓ PASS |
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT
The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on information compiled by the designated Competent Person, who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM). The Competent Person has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (the JORC Code).
[Competent Person], MAusIMM (CP)
CoreElement.AI · Sample Report
📋 COMPLETE REPORT PACKAGE - 20 DOCUMENTS
📑 MAIN REPORT & TABLE 1
Cover Page & Executive Summary
Project overview, key findings, CP endorsement
JORC Table 1, Section 1 - Sampling Techniques & Data
10 criteria: drilling, recovery, logging, sub-sampling, QA/QC, verification
JORC Table 1, Section 2 - Exploration Results
Reporting criteria, aggregation methods, data completeness
JORC Table 1, Section 3 - Mineral Resources
Database integrity, interpretation, estimation, classification, cut-off
JORC Table 1, Section 4 - Ore Reserves
Modifying factors, mining method, metallurgy, costs, economics
📊 RESOURCE ESTIMATION
Mineral Resource Statement
M+I+Inf by classification, tonnage, grade, contained metal
Ore Reserve Statement
Proved + Probable reserves post modifying factors
Sensitivity Analysis - Grade vs Tonnage
Resource at multiple cut-off grades with grade-tonnage curves
Block Model Parameters & Statistics
Parent/sub-block sizes, search parameters, kriging efficiency
Variography Report
Experimental variograms, model parameters, nugget/sill/range by domain
🔬 QA/QC & VALIDATION
QA/QC Summary Report
CRM control charts, blank results, duplicate HARD analysis, umpire lab
🗃 DRILLHOLE DATA & TABLES
Drillhole Collar Summary
All collar coordinates, depths, azimuths, dips - full dataset
Significant Intercepts Table
All mineralised intercepts with from/to/width/grade
Drillhole Location Plan
Plan view with collar positions, resource outline, infrastructure
Cross Sections & Long Sections
Geological interpretations, grade shells, drill traces
Bulk Density Measurements
344 immersion measurements by weathering domain
✍ COMPETENT PERSON
Competent Person Consent Form
Written CP consent per ASX Listing Rule 5.6 / 5.9
CP Declaration - JORC Code 2012
Formal declaration with qualifications, experience, independence
📎 APPENDICES
Appendix A - Complete Assay Database
All assay results with hole ID, from, to, element suite
Appendix B - QA/QC Control Charts
Shewhart charts for each CRM, duplicate scatter plots
Technical Report - NI 43-101 / Form 43-101F1
AURORA-7 Copper-Molybdenum Project · Highland Valley, British Columbia, Canada
§10. Drilling
Drilling conducted in 3 phases (2023-2025). Total 38 DDH holes (18,420m) and 15 RC holes (2,850m). All holes QAQC-validated per CIM best practices.
| HOLE ID | EASTING | NORTHING | DEPTH (m) | TYPE | BEST Cu INTERCEPT | Mo (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HV7-DDH-001 | 587,340 | 5,612,880 | 485 | DDH HQ | 124m @ 0.62% Cu from 186m | 220 |
| HV7-DDH-002 | 587,420 | 5,612,940 | 520 | DDH HQ | 98m @ 0.54% Cu from 248m | 175 |
| HV7-DDH-003 | 587,280 | 5,612,810 | 390 | DDH NQ | 76m @ 0.71% Cu from 164m incl. 22m @ 1.14% | 310 |
| HV7-DDH-004 | 587,500 | 5,613,020 | 610 | DDH HQ | 180m @ 0.48% Cu from 312m | 145 |
| ... 49 additional holes (full data in platform) ... | ||||||
§14. Mineral Resource Estimate (CIM 2014)
| CATEGORY | TONNAGE (Mt) | Cu (%) | Mo (ppm) | CONTAINED Cu (Mlb) | CONTAINED Mo (Mlb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ● Measured | 48.2 | 0.52 | 185 | 552 | 19.7 |
| ● Indicated | 124.6 | 0.41 | 142 | 1,126 | 39.0 |
| ● Inferred | 87.3 | 0.33 | 98 | 635 | 18.9 |
| TOTAL M+I+Inf | 260.1 | 0.40 | 135 | 2,313 | 77.6 |
App. Form 43-101F1 - Table of Contents (26 Items)
✓Item 1: Title Page - Aurora-7 Cu-Mo Project, Highland Valley BC
✓Item 2: Table of Contents - auto-generated with page numbers
✓Item 3: Summary - 2-page executive summary with key findings
✓Item 4: Property Description & Location - 15 mineral claims, 4,280 ha, Highland Valley district, UTM Zone 10N
✓Item 5: Accessibility, Climate, Infrastructure - 12km from Hwy 97C, 1,400m ASL, Continental climate
✓Item 6: History - Previous exploration by Cominco (1972-1981), Teck (1995-2003)
✓Item 7: Geological Setting - Quesnellia terrane, Guichon Creek batholith margin, calc-alkalic intrusive suite
✓Item 8: Deposit Types - Calc-alkalic porphyry Cu-Mo, stockwork veining in QFP
✓Item 9: Exploration - Magnetics, IP/Resistivity, soil geochemistry (Cu-Mo-Au pathfinder)
✓Item 10: Drilling - 53 holes, 21,270m total, DDH and RC
✓Item 11: Sample Preparation, Analyses, Security - ALS Vancouver, Cu by ICP-AES (Cu-OG62), Mo by ICP-MS
✓Item 12: Data Verification - CoreElement.AI QA/QC engine, 5% umpire (Bureau Veritas)
✓Item 13: Mineral Processing & Metallurgical Testing - Preliminary flotation: 89.2% Cu recovery at 28% concentrate
✓Item 14: Mineral Resource Estimates - OK block model, 10×10×10m, CIM 2014 classification
✓Items 15-22 - Mining methods, recovery, environmental, economics (preliminary)
✓Item 23: Adjacent Properties - Highland Valley Copper (Teck), Highmont deposit
✓Item 24: Other Relevant Data - 180m fault identified by CoreElement.AI multi-physics AI
✓Item 25: Interpretation & Conclusions - Significant porphyry Cu-Mo, further drilling recommended
✓Item 26: Recommendations - Phase 4 infill drilling (6,000m), metallurgical testing, PEA
QUALIFIED PERSON CERTIFICATE - NI 43-101
I, [Qualified Person], P.Geo., do hereby certify that: (1) I am a Professional Geoscientist registered with a provincial regulatory body; (2) I have the relevant education and professional qualifications; (3) I have practiced my profession continuously with specific experience relevant to porphyry copper-molybdenum deposits; (4) I have read the definition of "Qualified Person" set out in NI 43-101 and certify that by reason of education, affiliation with a professional association and past relevant work experience, I fulfil the requirements to be a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.
[Qualified Person], P.Geo.
CoreElement.AI · Sample Report
📋 COMPLETE REPORT PACKAGE - 32 DOCUMENTS
📑 MAIN REPORT
Technical Report - Form 43-101F1 (Full)
Complete 26-item report per NI 43-101 and CIM Standards
Item 1-3: Title Page, ToC, Summary
Executive summary with key findings and QP endorsement
🌍 GEOLOGICAL SECTIONS (Items 4-12)
Item 4: Property Description & Location
Mineral claims, coordinates, tenure, surface rights, royalties
Item 5: Accessibility & Infrastructure
Access roads, climate, power, water, labour, physiography
Item 6: History
Previous exploration, historical estimates, past production
Item 7: Geological Setting & Mineralization
Regional/local geology, structural controls, alteration, paragenesis
Item 8: Deposit Types
Genetic model, analogues, exploration implications
Item 9: Exploration
Geophysics (IP, magnetics), geochemistry, mapping, remote sensing
Item 10: Drilling
All drill programs, methods, core handling, downhole surveys
Item 11: Sample Preparation, Analyses & Security
Sample chain of custody, lab methods, preparation, analytical techniques
Item 12: Data Verification
QP site visit, independent checks, database validation
📊 RESOURCE & RESERVE (Items 13-15)
Item 13: Mineral Processing & Metallurgy
Flotation tests, recovery curves, concentrate grades, deleterious elements
Item 14: Mineral Resource Estimates
Block model, estimation method, classification, validation
Item 15: Mineral Reserve Estimates
Conversion from Resource, modifying factors, dilution, recovery
💰 FEASIBILITY & ECONOMICS (Items 16-26)
Item 16: Mining Methods
Open pit / underground design, geomechanics, mine plan
Item 17: Recovery Methods
Process flowsheet, design criteria, plant throughput
Item 18: Project Infrastructure
Tailings, water management, power, camp, roads
Item 19: Market Studies & Contracts
Commodity pricing, offtake, smelter terms, transport
Item 20: Environmental, Permitting & Social
Baseline studies, permits, closure, community engagement, IBA
Item 21: Capital & Operating Costs
CAPEX breakdown, OPEX per tonne, sustaining capital
Item 22: Economic Analysis
NPV/IRR, sensitivity, payback, break-even, scenario analysis
Item 23: Adjacent Properties
Neighbouring deposits, production history, relevance
Item 24: Other Relevant Data
AI-identified structures, novel datasets, additional analysis
Item 25: Interpretation & Conclusions
QP interpretation, confidence assessment, material risks
Item 26: Recommendations
Next-phase drilling, studies, budget, timeline
✍ QUALIFIED PERSON
QP Certificate - Form 43-101F2
Formal certification of qualifications, independence, site visit
QP Consent - Form 43-101F3
Written consent for SEDAR+ filing
🗃 SUPPORTING DATA
Complete Drillhole Database
Collar, survey, assay, lithology tables - full dataset
Resource Block Model Export
Block centroids, grades, classifications, density
QA/QC Analytical Package
CRM charts, duplicates, blanks, umpire comparison
Geological Maps & Sections Package
Plan views, cross sections, long sections, 3D wireframes
Financial Model - NPV/IRR Workbook
Full economic model with sensitivity toggles
Отчёт об оценке минеральных ресурсов - KAZRC / ГКЗ РК
Месторождение КЗ-АЛТЫН-47 · Блок A1 · Алтын-Дала, Центральный Казахстан
1. Классификация ресурсов - двойной формат (KAZRC / Советская система)
Ресурсы классифицированы одновременно по стандарту KAZRC (совместимому с CRIRSCO) и по традиционной советской системе категорий ГКЗ (C₁, C₂, P₁, P₂) для совместимости с требованиями МЭР РК.
| KAZRC КАТЕГОРИЯ | ГКЗ ЭКВИВАЛЕНТ | ТОННАЖ (тыс. т) | СОДЕРЖ. Au (г/т) | Au (кг) | Au (тыс. унц.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ● Measured (Измеренные) | B + C₁ (ч.) | 630 | 6.29 | 3,963 | 127.4 |
| ● Indicated (Показанные) | C₁ (ч.) + C₂ (ч.) | 1,550 | 5.17 | 8,014 | 257.7 |
| ● Inferred (Предполагаемые) | C₂ (ч.) | 1,250 | 3.97 | 4,963 | 159.6 |
| ИТОГО | - | 3,430 | 4.95 | 16,940 | 544.7 |
2. Маппинг категорий: Советская система → CRIRSCO
Маппинг между системами классификации является приблизительным и зависит от типа месторождения, плотности сети разведки и качества данных. Ниже приведена общая схема соответствия.
| СОВЕТСКАЯ КАТЕГОРИЯ | ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ | КАЗАХСТАНСКИЙ АНАЛОГ (KAZRC) | CRIRSCO ЭКВИВАЛЕНТ |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Детально разведанные, полностью изученные | Measured | Measured Resource |
| B | Разведанные с высокой степенью достоверности | Measured | Measured Resource |
| C₁ | Разведанные по редкой сети | Measured ÷ Indicated* | Measured ÷ Indicated* |
| C₂ | Предварительно оценённые | Indicated ÷ Inferred* | Indicated ÷ Inferred* |
| P1 | Прогнозные ресурсы (разведанных районов) | Exploration Target** | Exploration Results |
| P2 | Прогнозные ресурсы (мало изученных районов) | Exploration Target** | Exploration Results |
| P3 | Прогнозные ресурсы (потенциально перспективных) | - | - |
* Категории C1 и C2 не имеют прямого соответствия в системе CRIRSCO. В зависимости от плотности сети и качества данных, часть C₁ может быть переклассифицирована в Measured, а часть C₂ - в Indicated. Решение принимает Компетентное Лицо на основании конкретных данных проекта.
** P1/P2 не являются Mineral Resources по KAZRC и не могут использоваться для оценки стоимости активов или банковского финансирования. Они указываются отдельно как «Exploration Target» с соответствующими оговорками.
3. Данные бурения - КЗ-АЛТЫН-47
| СКВАЖИНА | ВОСТОК (X) | СЕВЕР (Y) | ГЛУБИНА (м) | ТИП | ЛУЧШИЙ ИНТЕРВАЛ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KZ-47-001 | 498,120 | 5,342,680 | 358 | DDH (HQ) | 14м @ 7.82 г/т Au с 142м |
| KZ-47-002 | 498,180 | 5,342,720 | 290 | DDH (NQ) | 9м @ 5.41 г/т Au с 198м |
| KZ-47-003 | 498,060 | 5,342,640 | 320 | DDH (HQ) | 22м @ 4.93 г/т Au с 167м вкл. 6м @ 12.8 г/т |
| KZ-47-004 | 498,240 | 5,342,760 | 180 | RC (140мм) | 5м @ 3.17 г/т Au с 88м |
| KZ-47-005 | 498,300 | 5,342,800 | 275 | DDH (HQ) | 11м @ 6.54 г/т Au с 204м |
| KZ-47-006 | 498,000 | 5,342,580 | 245 | DDH (NQ) | 8м @ 4.21 г/т Au с 156м |
| KZ-47-007 | 498,150 | 5,342,700 | 358 | DDH (HQ) | 28м @ 4.83 г/т Au с 290м вкл. 8м @ 11.2 г/т |
| ... 2 дополнительные скважины (полные данные доступны в платформе) ... | |||||
ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ КОМПЕТЕНТНОГО ЛИЦА - KAZRC
Настоящий отчёт подготовлен в соответствии с Кодексом KAZRC Республики Казахстан и является совместимым с Шаблоном CRIRSCO. Оценка ресурсов выполнена методом обыкновенного кригинга с верификацией методами IDW и NN. Все данные прошли полный цикл контроля качества (QA/QC) в соответствии с требованиями МЭР РК. Классификация ресурсов проведена в двойном формате - по системе KAZRC и по эквивалентным категориям ГКЗ (C₁/C₂/P₁) для обеспечения преемственности с существующей документацией.
[Компетентное Лицо], QP (CRIRSCO)
CoreElement.AI · Sample Report
📋 COMPLETE REPORT PACKAGE - 24 DOCUMENTS
📑 ОСНОВНОЙ ОТЧЁТ
Титульный лист и резюме
Обзор проекта, ключевые результаты, одобрение КЛ
Раздел 1 - Описание собственности и лицензий
Лицензионные участки, координаты, срок действия, недропользование
Раздел 2 - Геологическая обстановка
Региональная и локальная геология, структурный контроль, литология
Раздел 3 - История разведки
Советский период, современные работы, предыдущие оценки
Раздел 4 - Методы опробования
Керновое бурение, RC, отбор проб, интервалы, методика
Раздел 5 - Подготовка проб и анализы
Дробление, истирание, аналитические методы, аккредитация лаборатории
Раздел 6 - Контроль качества (QA/QC)
CRM, бланки, дубликаты, межлабораторный контроль
Раздел 7 - Классификация ресурсов KAZRC
Measured / Indicated / Inferred по стандарту KAZRC
Раздел 8 - Маппинг категорий ГКЗ
Таблица соответствия: A/B/C1/C2/P1/P2 → KAZRC → CRIRSCO
Раздел 9 - Методология оценки ресурсов
Кригинг, IDW, блочная модель, вариография, валидация
Раздел 10 - Анализ чувствительности
Ресурсы при различных бортовых содержаниях
Раздел 11 - Плотностные определения
Методы определения, результаты по зонам выветривания
Раздел 12 - Горно-геологические условия
Гидрогеология, геомеханика, газоносность
Раздел 13 - Технико-экономическое обоснование
ТЭО кондиций, параметры, экономические показатели
✍ РЕГУЛЯТОРНЫЕ ДОКУМЕНТЫ
Заявление Компетентного Лица (KAZRC)
Квалификация, опыт, декларация независимости
Справка о соответствии МЭР РК
Соответствие требованиям Министерства энергетики и ресурсов РК
Формуляр подачи в ГКЗ РК
Карточка месторождения, форма подачи запасов на баланс
🗃 ДАННЫЕ И ТАБЛИЦЫ
Сводка по скважинам (устья)
Координаты, глубины, азимуты - полная база данных
Таблица значимых пересечений
Все рудные интервалы: от/до/мощность/содержание
Карты контроля качества
Графики Шухарта для CRM, диаграммы дубликатов
Экспорт блочной модели
Центроиды блоков, содержания, классификация, плотность
🗺 ПРИЛОЖЕНИЯ
Планы и разрезы
Планы расположения скважин, геологические разрезы
База данных опробования
Полная аналитическая база: скважина / от / до / элементы
Двуязычный отчёт (РУС/ENG)
Параллельный текст для международных инвесторов
Mineral Resource Statement - SAMREC Code 2016
Witwatersrand West Gold Project · Gauteng, South Africa (Sample Dataset)
1. Mineral Resource Statement (SAMREC Table 1)
| CATEGORY | TONNAGE (Mt) | GRADE (g/t Au) | CM.g/t (cmg/t)* | Au (koz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ● Measured | 18.4 | 8.12 | 1,240 | 4,805 |
| ● Indicated | 32.7 | 6.48 | 980 | 6,815 |
| ● Inferred | 21.9 | 4.95 | 720 | 3,486 |
| TOTAL | 73.0 | 6.44 | - | 15,106 |
* cm.g/t = centimetre-grams per tonne, standard Witwatersrand reef width accumulation parameter. Channel sampling at 30cm intervals across reef.
2. SAMREC Table 1 - Key Sections
| SAMREC ITEM | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|
| Geological model | Tabular reef-type mineralisation in Carbon Leader and Ventersdorp Contact Reef (VCR). Strike 12km, dip 25°S. Reef channel width 0.3-2.8m (avg 1.2m). Payshoot geometry controlled by palaeotopographic channels. |
| Sampling | Underground channel sampling at 30cm intervals across reef. 14,280 channel samples over 2-year period. Surface diamond drilling: 28 holes (DDH), average depth 1,480m targeting reef at 1,200-1,800m below surface. |
| Estimation | Multiple Indicator Kriging (MIK) with 15 indicator thresholds. Block model: 25×25×reef thickness. Validated against underground grade control (±4.2% global reconciliation). |
| Mining factors | Conventional underground narrow-reef mining. Stoping width 1.0m minimum. Mining extraction 85%. Pillar losses 12%. Geological losses (faults, dykes) 8%. |
| SAMVAL parameters | Life of Mine: 18 years. Discount rate: 8.5%. Gold price: ZAR 1,480,000/kg. Operating cost: ZAR 680/t milled. Capital: ZAR 4.2bn remaining. |
3. Deep Drilling Summary - Surface DDH Program
| HOLE ID | EASTING | NORTHING | DEPTH (m) | TARGET REEF | REEF INTERCEPT | CM.G/T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WW-DDH-001 | 26°08'12"S | 27°42'18"E | 1,580 | Carbon Leader | 1.8m @ 14.2 g/t Au from 1,342m | 2,556 |
| WW-DDH-002 | 26°08'24"S | 27°42'30"E | 1,710 | VCR | 2.4m @ 9.8 g/t Au from 1,487m | 2,352 |
| WW-DDH-003 | 26°08'36"S | 27°42'06"E | 1,480 | Carbon Leader | 1.2m @ 22.4 g/t Au from 1,298m | 2,688 |
| WW-DDH-004 | 26°08'48"S | 27°42'42"E | 1,650 | VCR + CL | 3.1m @ 7.6 g/t Au from 1,410m | 2,356 |
| ... 24 additional deep holes not shown (full data in platform) ... | ||||||
4. QA/QC Summary
| QA/QC PARAMETER | PROTOCOL | RESULT | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Standards | 1:20 insertion (AMIS 0419, 0472) | Pass rate 97.8% (±2σ) | ✓ PASS |
| Blanks | 1:25 insertion (barren quartzite) | 0/142 failures (0.0%) | ✓ PASS |
| Underground Duplicates | 1:10 (adjacent channels) | Mean HARD 6.8% | ✓ PASS (<15%) |
| Umpire Lab | 10% to Mintek | Mean bias -1.2%, R²=0.992 | ✓ PASS |
| Grade Control Reconciliation | Monthly vs model | ±4.2% variance (12-month rolling) | ✓ PASS (<10%) |
5. SAMVAL 2016 Valuation Summary
| PARAMETER | VALUE | NOTES |
|---|---|---|
| Valuation Approach | DCF (primary) + Comparable Transactions | Per SAMVAL Code 2016 |
| Life of Mine | 18 years | Based on Measured + Indicated Resources only |
| Gold Price | ZAR 1,480,000/kg | 3-year trailing average, inflation-adjusted |
| Discount Rate (real) | 8.5% | South Africa country risk + project-specific |
| Operating Cost | ZAR 680/t milled | Inclusive of mining, processing, G&A |
| Capital Remaining | ZAR 4.2 billion | Shaft deepening, ventilation, infrastructure |
| NPV (M+I only) | ZAR 8.4 billion | Excluding Inferred Resources per SAMREC guidelines |
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT - SAMREC / SACNASP
This Mineral Resource statement has been prepared in accordance with the South African Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (The SAMREC Code, 2016 Edition) and complies with the requirements of the JSE Listings Requirements Section 12. The Competent Person is registered with SACNASP (Professional Natural Scientist category) and has sufficient relevant experience in Witwatersrand-type gold deposits to qualify as a Competent Person under the SAMREC Code.
[Competent Person], Pr.Sci.Nat. (SACNASP)
Head of Geostatistics, CoreElement.AI · February 2026
📋 COMPLETE REPORT PACKAGE - 22 DOCUMENTS
📑 MAIN REPORT
Cover Page & Executive Summary
Project overview, key findings, CP endorsement per SAMREC 2016
📋 SAMREC TABLE 1
SAMREC Table 1 - Exploration Results
Geology, drilling, sampling, analysis, data verification criteria
SAMREC Table 1 - Mineral Resources
Geological model, estimation methodology, classification criteria, cut-offs
SAMREC Table 1 - Mineral Reserves
Modifying factors, mining method, dilution, recovery, economic viability
🔬 TECHNICAL STUDIES
Geological Model & Interpretation
Reef geometry, structural controls, channel width, payshoot analysis
Sampling & Data Quality
Underground channel sampling, surface drilling, sample preparation, QA/QC
Resource Estimation Methodology
MIK estimation, block dimensions, indicator thresholds, validation
Mining & Modifying Factors
Stoping width, mining extraction, pillar/geological losses, dilution
Metallurgical Testwork & Recovery
Gold recovery, gravity/CIL circuit, reagent consumption, refractory assessment
💰 VALUATION & COMPLIANCE
SAMVAL 2016 Valuation Report
DCF, comparable transactions, income approach, discount rate justification
Environmental & Social Assessment
NEMA compliance, water use licence, social labour plan, mine closure
Mineral Rights & Tenure
Mining right per MPRDA, B-BBEE ownership, SLP obligations
✍ COMPETENT PERSON
CP Statement - SACNASP
Pr.Sci.Nat. declaration, qualifications, relevant experience
JSE Section 12 Compliance Certificate
Listing requirements compliance, material change assessment
🗃 SUPPORTING DATA
Channel Sampling Database
Underground channel sample results with reef width and accumulation
Surface Drillhole Database
Deep DDH collar, survey, assay - full dataset
Resource Block Model Export
Block centroids, grades, cm.g/t, classifications, reef width
Grade-Tonnage & Sensitivity Analysis
Resource at multiple cut-off cm.g/t values
SAMVAL Financial Model
DCF workbook, commodity sensitivity, operating cost model
Geological Plans - Reef Horizon
Reef structure contours, payshoot outlines, fault traces
Mine Plan & Infrastructure Layout
Shaft positions, decline access, ventilation, stoping blocks
QA/QC & Reconciliation Report
Grade control reconciliation, CRM/duplicate analysis
Public Reporting of Mineral Resources - PERC Reporting Standard 2021
Northern Finland Lithium Project (Sample Dataset) · Ostrobothnia, Finland
1. Mineral Resource Estimate (PERC 2021)
LCE (Lithium Carbonate Equivalent) calculated using conversion factor Li₂O × 2.473 = LCE (molecular weight ratio Li₂CO₃/Li₂O = 73.891/29.881). Resource reported at 0.4% Li₂O cut-off grade. Classification per PERC 2021 guidelines on geological confidence and drill spacing.
| CATEGORY | TONNAGE (Mt) | Li₂O (%) | CONTAINED Li₂O (kt) | LCE EQUIVALENT (kt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ● Measured | 4.1 | 1.42 | 58.2 | 143.9 |
| ● Indicated | 12.8 | 1.28 | 163.8 | 405.1 |
| ● Inferred | 8.5 | 1.05 | 89.3 | 220.8 |
| TOTAL | 25.4 | 1.22 | 311.3 | 769.8 |
2. PERC Reporting Template - Key Items
| PERC ITEM | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|
| Geology & interpretation | LCT (Li-Cs-Ta) type spodumene-bearing pegmatite swarm. 12 individual pegmatite bodies, strike 2.8km, true width 5-45m. Mineralisation zoned: spodumene core → muscovite intermediate → wall zone. Country rock: amphibolite-grade Svecofennian metasediments. |
| Drilling | 62 DDH holes (NQ, HQ), 12,840m total. Hole spacing: 25×50m (Measured), 50×100m (Indicated). Oriented core (Reflex ACT III). Core recovery 98.4% average in pegmatite. |
| Assaying | Li₂O by sodium peroxide fusion ICP-OES (ALS Outokumpu). Ta₂O₅ by XRF. Sn by ICP-MS. QAQC: CRM AMIS 0356 (1:20), blanks (1:30). All within ±3σ tolerance. |
| Estimation | OK in 10×25×5m blocks, domained by individual pegmatite body. Top-cut applied at 2.8% Li₂O (99th percentile). Validated by global comparison with polygonal and NN estimates (±3.2%). |
| Reasonable Prospects | PERC 2021 requires demonstration of 'reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction'. Assessment based on: spodumene DMS concentrate at 6% Li₂O, market price US$1,450/t SC6, operating cost €420/t ore, recovery 72%. Cut-off grade 0.4% Li₂O derived from Whittle pit optimisation. |
3. Drilling Summary - Spodumene Pegmatite
| HOLE ID | EASTING | NORTHING | DEPTH (m) | PEGMATITE BODY | BEST Li₂O INTERCEPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF-DDH-001 | 348,120 | 7,124,680 | 185 | P1 (Main) | 28m @ 1.62% Li₂O from 42m |
| NF-DDH-002 | 348,180 | 7,124,720 | 210 | P1 (Main) | 35m @ 1.48% Li₂O from 58m incl. 12m @ 2.1% |
| NF-DDH-003 | 348,060 | 7,124,640 | 165 | P2 (North) | 18m @ 1.35% Li₂O from 34m |
| NF-DDH-004 | 348,240 | 7,124,760 | 230 | P1 (Main) | 42m @ 1.54% Li₂O from 72m incl. 8m @ 2.4% |
| NF-DDH-005 | 347,980 | 7,124,580 | 195 | P3 (South) | 22m @ 1.18% Li₂O from 48m |
| ... 57 additional holes not shown (full data in platform) ... | |||||
4. Sensitivity Analysis - Resource vs Cut-off Grade
| CUT-OFF (% Li₂O) | TONNES (Mt) | GRADE (% Li₂O) | CONTAINED Li₂O (kt) | LCE EQUIV. (kt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 32.8 | 1.04 | 341 | 843 |
| 0.4 (base case) | 25.4 | 1.22 | 311 | 769 |
| 0.6 | 20.1 | 1.38 | 277 | 685 |
| 0.8 | 15.6 | 1.51 | 236 | 583 |
| 1.0 | 11.2 | 1.64 | 184 | 455 |
| 1.5 | 5.8 | 1.89 | 110 | 272 |
5. QA/QC Summary
| QA/QC PARAMETER | PROTOCOL | RESULT | STATUS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRM Standards | 1:20 insertion (AMIS 0356) | Pass rate 98.1% (±3σ) | ✓ PASS |
| Blanks | 1:30 insertion (certified quartzite) | 0/68 failures (0.0%) | ✓ PASS |
| Field Duplicates | 1:25 (quarter-core) | Mean HARD 6.2% | ✓ PASS (<15%) |
| Umpire Lab | 5% to GTK (Finland) | Mean bias +1.4%, R²=0.994 | ✓ PASS (<5%) |
| Data Validation | CoreElement.AI auto-checks | 8/32,140 records corrected (0.02%) | ✓ PASS |
6. EU Taxonomy Alignment
| EU TAXONOMY CRITERION | STATUS | COMMENTARY |
|---|---|---|
| Substantial Contribution | ✓ ALIGNED | Critical Raw Material (lithium) per EU CRM Act 2024. Essential for battery supply chain. |
| DNSH - Climate Mitigation | ✓ PASS | GHG emissions below threshold. Carbon footprint: 4.2 tCO₂e/t LCE (vs 12.8 global avg). |
| DNSH - Water | ✓ PASS | Closed-loop water system. Zero discharge to Ostrobothnia watershed. |
| DNSH - Biodiversity | ⚠ PENDING | Natura 2000 proximity assessment in progress. 2.4km buffer to nearest site. |
| Social Safeguards | ✓ PASS | ILO conventions, OECD Due Diligence, local community engagement plan in place. |
COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT - PERC / EFG
This report has been prepared in accordance with the PERC Reporting Standard 2021 Edition. The Competent Person holds the title of European Geologist (EurGeol) through the European Federation of Geologists (EFG) and is a member of a Recognised Member Professional Organisation. The Competent Person has more than 15 years of relevant experience in lithium pegmatite exploration and resource estimation, qualifying as a Competent Person under the PERC Standard.
[Competent Person], EurGeol (EFG)
CoreElement.AI · Sample Report
📋 COMPLETE REPORT PACKAGE - 22 DOCUMENTS
📑 MAIN REPORT
Cover Page & Executive Summary
Project overview, key findings, CP endorsement per PERC 2021
📋 PERC TEMPLATE SECTIONS
PERC Template, Section 1 - Project Description
Location, tenure, access, infrastructure, environmental setting
PERC Template, Section 2 - Geological Setting
Regional geology, local geology, deposit model, structural controls
PERC Template, Section 3 - Exploration & Drilling
Exploration methods, drill programs, oriented core, downhole surveys
PERC Template, Section 4 - Sampling & Analysis
Sample collection, preparation, analytical methods, chain of custody
PERC Template, Section 5 - Data Verification & QA/QC
CRM, blanks, duplicates, umpire laboratory, database validation
🔬 TECHNICAL STUDIES
Geological Interpretation Report
Pegmatite body wireframes, zonation, spodumene distribution
Resource Estimation Methodology
OK estimation, block model, domain boundaries, top-cut, validation
Resource Classification Report
Drill spacing criteria, confidence categories, classification methodology
Reasonable Prospects Assessment
RPEEE demonstration: DMS flowsheet, market pricing, cut-off derivation
Ore Reserve Statement (if applicable)
Modifying factors, mine design, dilution, economic assessment
Mineral Processing & Metallurgy
DMS testwork, flotation, spodumene concentrate specifications
Environmental & Social Impact
EU EIA Directive compliance, Natura 2000, social licence, closure plan
Mining Right & Permitting Status
Finnish Mining Act compliance, reservation/exploration/mining permits
✍ COMPETENT PERSON & COMPLIANCE
CP Statement - EFG / EurGeol
European Geologist declaration, RMPO membership, relevant experience
EU Taxonomy Alignment Report
Screening criteria for critical raw materials, DNSH assessment
🗃 SUPPORTING DATA
Drillhole Database
Collar, survey, assay, lithology - complete dataset
Resource Block Model Export
Block centroids, Li₂O grades, classifications, density
QA/QC Analytical Package
CRM charts, blank results, duplicate analysis, umpire comparison
Sensitivity & Grade-Tonnage Analysis
Resource at multiple Li₂O cut-offs with LCE equivalent
Geological Maps & Cross Sections
Pegmatite body outlines, drill traces, grade distribution
Financial Model - Preliminary Economics
SC6 pricing, DMS OPEX, CAPEX, NPV/IRR workbook
CRIRSCO International Reporting Template - Cross-Standard Mapping
Demonstration of CoreElement.AI Multi-Standard Reporting Capability
1. Classification Equivalence - All Standards
| CRIRSCO | JORC 2012 | NI 43-101 / CIM | KAZRC | SAMREC | PERC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exploration Results | Exploration Results | Exploration Information | P1/P2/P3 | Exploration Results | Exploration Results |
| Inferred Resource | Inferred | Inferred | C2 (partial) | Inferred | Inferred |
| Indicated Resource | Indicated | Indicated | C1 (partial) + C2 (partial) | Indicated | Indicated |
| Measured Resource | Measured | Measured | A + B + C1 (partial) | Measured | Measured |
| Probable Reserve | Probable | Probable | C1 (economic) | Probable | Probable |
| Proved Reserve | Proved | Proven | A + B (economic) | Proved | Proved |
2. Competent Person / Qualified Person Requirements
| CODE | TITLE | REGISTRATION BODY | MIN. EXPERIENCE | KEY REQUIREMENT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JORC | Competent Person (CP) | AusIMM / AIG / RPEQ | 5 years relevant | MAusIMM or equivalent + relevant deposit type experience |
| NI 43-101 | Qualified Person (QP) | P.Geo / P.Eng (provincial) | 5 years relevant | Professional geoscientist/engineer registration in Canada |
| KAZRC | Competent Person | CRIRSCO-aligned body | 5 years relevant | KAZRC-registered CP or CRIRSCO-recognised international equivalent |
| SAMREC | Competent Person (CP) | SACNASP (Pr.Sci.Nat.) | 5 years relevant | SACNASP registration as Professional Natural Scientist |
| PERC | Competent Person (CP) | EFG (EurGeol) or RMPO | 5 years relevant | European Geologist title or Recognised Member Professional Organisation |
| SME Guide | Qualified Person (QP) | SME-RM (Registered Member) | 10 years, 5 relevant | SME Registered Member. US SEC S-K 1300 aligned since 2019. |
3. CoreElement.AI Auto-Mapping Capability
📋 CROSS-STANDARD REFERENCE PACKAGE - 12 DOCUMENTS
📑 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
CRIRSCO International Reporting Template 2019
Full template with definitions, classification criteria, reporting guidelines
Classification Equivalence Matrix
Detailed mapping: JORC ↔ CIM ↔ KAZRC ↔ SAMREC ↔ PERC + 8 others
CP/QP Requirements - All Jurisdictions
Registration bodies, experience requirements, mutual recognition
Dual-Coding Report Guide
How to report under 2+ standards simultaneously with audit trail
Table 1 Cross-Reference
Section-by-section mapping across JORC Table 1, NI 43-101 Items, SAMREC Table 1, PERC Template
🔄 CONVERSION GUIDES
Soviet GKZ → CRIRSCO Conversion Guide
A/B/C1/C2/P1/P2/P3 mapping rules and decision criteria
ASX ↔ TSX ↔ JSE ↔ LSE Filing Guide
Exchange-specific disclosure requirements and filing procedures
CoreElement.AI Auto-Mapping White Paper
Technical documentation on AI-driven cross-standard conversion engine
🛠 TOOLS & TEMPLATES
Classification Decision Tree Workbook
Interactive decision logic for resource/reserve categorisation
National Code Compliance Checklist
Tick-sheet for checking compliance with each CRIRSCO member code
CRIRSCO Member Organisations Directory
Contact details and registration procedures for all member bodies
Multi-Jurisdiction Reporting Template
Unified Excel template for dual/triple-coded resource statements
When you generate a report on CoreElement.AI, the platform automatically maps your resource estimate to the selected reporting standard. If your project operates across multiple jurisdictions (e.g., a Kazakhstan asset listed on ASX), you can generate dual-coded reports with one click - KAZRC for MER RK regulatory submission and JORC for ASX disclosure - from the same underlying data with full audit trail showing exactly how categories were mapped.